On 2/11/11 10:55 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > what do you think of working around the memcpy troubles with glibc-2.13 by > simply redirecting memcpy to memmove within glibc, either unconditionally or > optional/temporary (via USE-flag?) until everyone uses memmove where > necessary?
I'm not a maintainer of base-system, but it seems to me that such a change in behavior would only add to the confusion. glibc behaving differently on Gentoo than other distros... no, that doesn't sound good. Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
