On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:01:16 +0000 Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org> wrote: > [snip] > > I agree that this could be better. To me, most of the problems with > this are due to users not knowing which of these should be set for > their particular CPU. > > Instead of having defaults set by a profile, I'd like to figure out a > way we can have these flags set by default dependent on the user's > CPU. This might require some additional logic in portage; I don't > know. I think the fewer sources of magic USE flags the better. Maybe we could document how to figure out what instruction sets a processor supports in the handbook instead. -- fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
