On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 02:56:17 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote: > >> Mike Frysinger writes: > >>> well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the > >>> masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at > >>> that point. > >> > >> Is there somewhere which tells users when there are upgrades to > >> toolchain packages which are not revbumped once they have been unmasked > >> and in ~arch? > > > > if they arent revbumped, then the changes dont matter to you > > This isn't always the case though, due to developer mistakes.
now you're talking about a bug that should be reported -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
