Wouldn't it also make sense to have "per-category eclasses"? This seems much more useful for me.
Examples where this would already make sense today: kde-meta, latex-package, ... Best, Andreas On Sunday 19 September 2010 21:14:56 Matti Bickel wrote: > I'm a couple weeks late with this, but here goes: > from my failed attempts at reviving GLEP33 grow a discussion with > ferringb on IRC about how to get what I wanted anyway :) > > We agreed that having eclasses specific to a package located someplace > near the actual ebuilds was beneficial and should be supported by PMs > somehow. Someplace and somehow are specified along some other details in > the attached proposed GLEP. > > I'm posting this for review by the wider community, at the same time > asking the GLEP editors (antarus? pva?) for guidance on the formalities. > I gather the GLEP should get a number and be uploaded in CVS somewhere, > as well as appear on the GLEP project page. > > So, yeah, what do you think? Is it worth it? Can the draft be improved? > I'm specifically interested in the amount of work involved in supporting > something like the thing laid out in the GLEP in our current PMs. > -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, sunrise dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
