On Friday 17 of September 2010 16:52:03 Markos Chandras wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:51:52PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > On Friday 17 of September 2010 12:41:51 Angelo Arrifano wrote: > > > Every single QA commit review coming into my Inbox during the past week > > > was directed to arfrever. I *know* he is on probation, I *know* he made > > > mistakes - in fact every one makes mistakes. But you guys are hammering > > > all over him for picky stuff. > > > > > > Remind you that while it is a pleasure to be member of Gentoo, we are > > > not your slaves; we chose to spend our free time contributing to Gentoo > > > for several reasons - fun, knowledge and team work. Satisfying somebody > > > else's flavors and wishes is certainly *not* one of them. > > > > > > I never had the chance to talk with arfrever, nor I ever looked to his > > > work at Gentoo. But there is one thing I definitely got right, he has a > > > lot of motivation to continue in Gentoo and *offer* his time and > > > knowledge, otherwise he would just raise the middle finger and go away > > > after all of this bashing. > > > > The other important thing is such "lecturing" should probably take place > > in private, like gentoo-core. > > Well, Angelo is quite right for posting in this ML because QA members > wants anything to be publicly visible.
No, I mean, "lecturing" Arfrever should take place in private... -- regards MM
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
