On 09/11/2010 11:20 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Saturday 11 of September 2010 22:18:32 Petteri Räty wrote: >> On 09/11/2010 11:14 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: >>> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:10:51 +0300 >>> >>> Petteri Räty <betelge...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>> + >>>>> +*hachoir-parser-1.3.4 (10 Sep 2010) >>>>> + >>>>> + 10 Sep 2010; Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis >>>>> <arfre...@gentoo.org> + -hachoir-parser-1.3.3.ebuild, >>>>> +hachoir-parser-1.3.4.ebuild: + Version bump. >>>> >>>> Deleting an older version is relevant so it should also be mentioned in >>>> the ChangeLog message. >>> >>> It says -hachoir-parser-1.3.3.ebuild. What exactly do you think would be >>> gained by adding "Remove old" in this case? >> >> Following your logic we should not write "Version bump" either (as >> that's what happens by default when you add a new ebuild). > > Considering the fact, that ChangeLogs are files that contribute to rsync/cvs > fetch the most, it's not that bad idea... >
ChangeLog not changing at all would probably save traffic there but even without no custom message there's still the echangelog generated part about changed files. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
