On 2 August 2010 22:40, Matti Bickel <m...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 08/02/2010 08:16 PM, David Leverton wrote: >> If so, it sounds like what you really want is per-package eclasses >> (maybe with elibs as well to hold the non-metadata code), which >> aren't covered by GLEP33 but ought to be easy enough to add. > > It's actually covered by GLEP33: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0033.html#tree-restructuring
I interpreted that more as a way to organise the global eclasses, but yes, it could be used for per-package stuff too. I'd still prefer to have the eclasses next to the ebuilds they're meant to be used by, but that's just a detail (and as I say, could easily be added to the GLEP if anyone else wants it).
