On Thursday 15 of July 2010 16:24:08 Mike Auty wrote: > On 15/07/10 14:57, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > And what about using portage 2.2 and be done with it. I don't see the > > point in reinventing the wheel yet again. > > I'm using portage-2.2 and have been since it first came out. I find the > @set notation invaluable.
From my perspective sets notation is actually worthless and confusing (but that's another topic). IIRC I've already spoke with portage team to think about making it emerge option instead or at least decouple it from sets semantics if possible (or it was about @live-rebuild? hmm). I think there are some preserved-related bugs (false positives) that need to be fixed first. Otherwise I'd welcome it being stable. I've already forgot what revdep-rebuild is thanks to portage-2.2 -- regards MM
