On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 06:03:49PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 00:56:52 +0200
> Enrico Weigelt <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > 
> > YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
> > 
> > It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
> > missing maildir directories.
> 
> Upstream first (TM).

I'm pretty sure that the main problem with procmail is that its upstream is 
quite dead. The proper solution might be simply a fork of procmail by someone 
who is willing to accept and apply distros' patches. This would be completely 
independent of distributions... or could be similar to Fedora (or a Fedora 
maintainer) starting up tigervnc. The problem with this approach would be 
getting enough momentum behind it and having distributions recognize such a 
fork.

I was myself interested in pushing a patch (unfortunately it's still unfinished 
:-/) to procmail's upstream, but had trouble finding the upstream. If anyone 
has had better luck or knows of a fork like I describe above, I'd be 
interested. Of course, knowing that there is an upstream to submit such a patch 
to would be a great encouragement for me to finish writing it. ;-)

-- 
binki

Look out for missing or extraneous apostrophes!

Attachment: pgpEtPmtEqhNY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to