On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:55:42 +0300
Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Oh come on. I never said to stop supporting those arches. I just said
> to shrink their stable tree. What do you suggest? Pretend to have
> active exotic arches just to look shiny and pretty?

Claiming to support an exotic arch but forcing people to run ~arch on
it is not supporting it at all. One of the problems with exotic archs
is that they are much more likely to show up bugs than things that are
commonly used, and so knowing that something has been properly tested
is a lot more important there.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to