* Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> schrieb: > I suggest you to try latest available dev-lang/icc (11.1.072). > This thing is really paranoid: > > remark #2259: non-pointer conversion from "int" to "unsigned char" may lose > significant bits > unsigned char BlinkerPhase = 0; > ... > BlinkerPhase = (BlinkerPhase + 1) & 3;
In this case, the compiler is wrong: it should convert to int and back to char here ;-p > remark #981: operands are evaluated in unspecified order (tons of them) > return strcmp( left.c_str(), right.c_str() ) > 0; I'm not sure if this really qualifies an warning, since - AFAIK - C spec never said, that there is an evaluation order for function parameters. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
