On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:07:26 +0200
Petteri Räty <betelge...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 03/27/2010 04:51 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
> >
> > The only reason I don't really like this is because it breaks
> > consistency. We have a ground rule, assign to maintainer, CC
> > arch(es). Why make it more complicated? I have a feeling people
> > will continue CCing arches out of habit.
+1.
> I don't think we should punish people for not doing it this way but
> consider it the preferred way when doing new bugs. The initial point
> here was to tell arches that assigning bugs directly to them is not
> wrong.
Not wrong, just annoying for the arch team in question. Before
resolving the bug report, you'd reassign to the maintainer and then
close it? Why change it around twice, or even once for that matter?
jer
