Hi all, On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:34:08PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 02/08/2010 02:11 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Nikos Chantziaras<rea...@arcor.de>: > >> A Gnome user probably has "X gtk -qt" in make.conf, while a KDE user > >> has "X qt -gtk" in hope to have programs that support both Gtk and Qt > >> being built with the toolkit that is more native to his DE. When a > >> package has a GUI tool that is able to only use one of those > >> toolkits, people who have it disabled in make.conf will get no GUI > >> tool at all even though they have "X" in their USE flags. > > > > Your proposal does not look to appealing to me. What about people > > trying to keep "pollution" down and avoid one or the other toolkit? > > This would mean that we favor one group of people over another :P If a package can run in some form without a certain toolkit, why should we force people to install that toolkit with the package? Imho that is bloating their systems unnecessarily.
William
pgpCPQNJ7ztNl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
