On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 02:23:42AM -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> > The SHA512 algorithm is available in Python 2.5, which has been a
> > dependency of Portage since approximately Python 2.1.6.13.
> <snip>
> I hate to nitpick, but I believe you meant Portage in that line.
Thanks :-) Fixed.

> However, great work on this GLEP, you've put forth some good solid
> research into it.
> 
> I do hope that we don't intend on settling on SHA512 as the end all
> solution as well. We should retain a method for bumping the hashing
> algorithm used when the SHA-3 family becomes available.
The present Portage logic I believe requires SHA1 still be present (so
I'm not sure how good the second patch I gave would be), and I'd like
that to change to rather be the strongest supported & available
algorithm.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail     : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Attachment: pgp6HykmYofid.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to