On 01/18/2010 10:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Petteri Räty wrote: > >> With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't >> annoy users any more with ebeep or epause > > Agreed. > >> so attached is a patch only defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 >> and 2. Anyone have a reason to keep these around for EAPI 3? > > We wouldn't gain much by this, because we still have to go through all > ebuilds using ebeep and epause and change them to EAPI 3. >
This would force people to upgrade when migrating to EAPI 3. > This would be at least the same amount of work as removing the ebeep > and epause calls from all ebuilds. Why don't we do this instead and > leave the eclass as it is? > This would make sure no-one uses these even in overlays. > There are already enough differences between EAPIs for devs to learn, > and IMHO we shouldn't introduce additional complications such as EAPI > dependent eclass behaviour (except where necessary, e.g. src_prepare). > Yes but as people shouldn't have the need for these there's not that much to learn here. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
