El sáb, 16-01-2010 a las 17:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan escribió: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Lars Wendler <polynomia...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> It's just impossible to choose perfect location that suits all needs and > >> it should stay user-configurable. So again, do not change this default > >> we no real need another time, please. > > > > /usr/local is a bad choice for an ebuild-generated default. Like I said in > > bug > > #253725 I don't want ebuilds to mess with stuff in /usr/local. So either > > remove > > this default completely and let the user decide when setting up layman or > > move > > it around. > > The best suggestions I've read here for now were either /var/layman or > > /usr/layman which I would have no problem with. > > > > /me throws in /usr/share/layman > > OTOH, I really think /usr/local/layman is OK as long as it's > runtime-generated and not added by the ebuild. That should satisfy bug > 253725, and prevent another painful location move. It also makes sense > from the "/usr/local is user/admin domain" since only running the > layman tool will cause those directories to be created. >
From my (layman user) point of view I am still using /usr/portage/local for it because I prefer to have all "portage trees" in the same place. Maybe another option could be to have a /usr/portage/overlays directory used for "unofficial" overlays, then, layman configuration stuff (like its make.conf and so) could be present under /etc/layman, while overlays (sunrise, gnome...) could be installed under /usr/portage/overlays
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
