В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 10:05 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет: > On 07-11-2009 17:54:25 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: > > > We could introduce "noarch" and "~noarch" KEYWORDS, add "noarch" to > > > the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct > > > unstable users to add "~noarch" to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. > > > > Looks like this will not work for all noarch packages. Stardict > > dictionary itself is noarch, but it RDEPENDS on stardict package which > > is keyworded only on some archs. So we'll be forced either to keyword > > stardict on all archs or we need to introduce some new way to work with > > such situations. > > Would it be reasonable to just mask in such case? Resolution would > eventually just hit the masked stardict dictionary and display the > reason why it's masked (stardict doesn't compile, not yet looked into > keywording: please try, etc.)
As I understand: absense of ~arch keyword means package is masked on ~arch since nobody yet looked at this package. I was asking here: since noarch is allowed on all archs, how this noarch over arch KEYWORD stacking may work? -- Peter.
