Le 03/09/2009 23:10, Mounir Lamouri a écrit :
Duncan wrote:
Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:
However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not
introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+ or so, instead? That would
be transparent and use existing means.
I've always thought Gentoo needed "plus" versions of the versioned
licenses, anyway. GPL-2, GPL-2+, GPL-3, and GPL-3+, should all be
different licenses, because really, they are.
AFAIK, GPL-2 and GPL-2+ are not different, may you tell me more about that ?
GPL-2+ means "GPL-2 GPL-3 GPL-4 ..."
Not quite the same thing as just "GPL-2"
Rémi
