>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Thomas Anderson wrote: > Attached is the preliminary meeting agenda.
Agenda is fine with me. > Define EAPI development/deployment cycles > ----------------------------------------- > Last meeting several members expressed support for Ciaran McCreesh's > suggestions[1]. I think we should try the outlined procedure for the next EAPI, with one exception: | [...] give them all an arbitrary codename that in no way describes | the feature To keep it simple we should choose names that roughly describe what the features are about. | (so that certain people can't vote and discuss things based upon | what they think the feature is without bothering to find out if it's | anything to do with what they assume). Of course that's not desirable. But can you give a concrete example where such a thing happened? Ulrich > [1]: > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_d3a4758c455fded00608e891f525d3cc.xml
