> Hello people, > > as the discussion about glep55 has gone in circles long enough I decided to > collect the various ideas presented around that theme complex and compare > them in a way that might allow us to reach a sane decision. > > Since it has become quite a lot of text I've kept some parts in sentence > fragments and bullet points. If anyone feels the need to change that into > more verbose wording feel free to do so, I hope the idea is clear enough. I > feel it is still a draft and could use some massaging. > > If I should have forgotten any approach or misrepresented one I'd > appreciate an updated or rephrased section so it can be easily updated. > > For anyone not interested in reading the whole thing, the conclusion is > that we want to have the eapi in an easily parsed form in the ebuilds. The > versioning rule change discussion (mostly glep54) should happen in an > independent discussion. > > hth, > > Patrick
Thanks for that :) I am so on board with nihilists' proposal but if this is not accepted, haubis' seems the most clean solution to me. I really dont like the idea of changing the file extension in anyway since .ebuild is something that defines Gentoo. It is like changing .deb for Debian :P. Somethings must stay untouched. -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer [KDE/Qt/Sunrise/Sound] Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
