2009/5/17 Thomas de Grenier de Latour <tom...@free.fr>: > On 2009/05/17, Thomas Anderson <gentoofa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> - Vote on GLEP 54 >> This vote was called for by dertobi123. The vote was on >> whether to approve GLEP 54 conditional on whether GLEP 55 is passed. >> The reason for this is that GLEP 54 is unimplementable without the >> problems mentioned in GLEP 55 being solved. >> >> Conclusion: >> Conditionally approved on whether GLEP 55 is approved. > > > Sorry if the question has already been raised (i would be surprised it > was not), but... Back in january [1], it was decided that base profile > (and thus package.mask) should stay in EAPI=0 syntax. So once you've > approved GLEP55 (or an alternative) and introduced an EAPI with support > for -scm suffix, how will you package.mask this new-style live ebuilds?
You set KEYWORDS="". If you need to do something in profiles with it you can use profile eapis. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński
