Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> posted 4a082814.2050...@gentoo.org,
excerpted below, on  Mon, 11 May 2009 15:28:52 +0200:

> I'm not sure if would be better have QEMU_TARGETS or separated
> USER_TARGETS and SOFTMMU_TARGETS.

Namespace pollution? QEMU_USER_TARGETS and QEMU_SOFTMMU_TARGETS, maybe?

Other than that, no preference.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


Reply via email to