On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:54:02 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:51:00 -0600 > Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:22:36 +0100 > > Tiziano Müller <dev-z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless > > > > state? > > > Yes, I'd like to see it enable by default as well, but we have to > > > discuss that further. So, not suited for a fast eapi release. > > > > Please fix all 'pkg fails tests' bugs in bugzilla first. > > The nice thing about doing it on an EAPI bump is that it's > incremental. As people move towards EAPI 3, they'll all get caught > and fixed. Actually, that's a very good point. > With the current situation, src_test is worthless because a failure > doesn't mean there's a problem worth investigating. But if EAPI 3 > starts making src_test "run unless explicitly RESTRICTed or disabled", > any src_test failure in an EAPI 3 package will tell people something > requires attention. Whether it's enabled for EAPI 3 or not, I'd at least like to see 'test' added to FEATURES in targets/developer/make.defaults now. That should (hopefully) raise the visibility somewhat. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
