Hi, Josh Saddler <[email protected]>:
> Tiziano Müller wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of > > new problems. One of them are the use dependencies when the package > > you depend on doesn't have the use flag anymore (see [1] for an > > example). > > > > So I think it's time for a short eapi bump with some distinct > > improvements: > > > > http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pPAJXP6shYH78lCXeqRqCUQ > > Is there a reason why we should ram through a new EAPI for something > that *looks* like another "Paludis supports this so let's make it a > Portage standard" proposal? Is there some kind of time deadline here > that you all want? built_with_use supports exactly that with the --missing switch and yesterday I noticed some ebuilds that could not be transferred to EAPI 2 because of that. > Also, why the bannination of || ( foo? (.).) -- how is it error prone, > exactly. I would like to hear about that, too. V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode <URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
