On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:24:16 +0000
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:16:54 +0100
> Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > You're doubling the number of files that have to be read for an
> > > operation that's almost purely i/o bound. On top of that, you're
> > > introducing a whole bunch of disk seeks in what's otherwise a nice
> > > linear operation.
> > 
> > I see words, not numbers.
> 
> Number: double. That's a '2 times'.

That only means you're increasing the constant factor in the
complexity of the thing... which may very well be completely negligible
unless someone provides real benchmarks. I would be very surprised if
that "2 times" factor happens to be true, because finding a string in a
file is an order of magnitude simpler than sourcing said file with
bash. Moreover this doesn't take into account disk and os cache.

Alexis.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to