On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:51:14 -0600 Jeremy Olexa <darks...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > > All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing > > header) patches will be applied by me in the coming week. If you > > have concerns about me touching your package (i swear i'll wash my > > hands first), please let me know. > > > > As always, applying these patches yourself makes me a happy monkey. > > > > I'll try to have this done by the end of the week. I will also > > handle filing of stabilization bugs for these packages at the end of > > February. > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=198121&max > > depth=1&hide_resolved=1 > > Ryan, > Surely, at this point we aren't going to let all those bugs hold up > gcc-4.3 stabilization? Most of which were only found via Diego's > tinderboxing which implies that no user cares enough about the package > to report a bug (or no one uses the package). I've been working on the > gcc-4.3 stabilzation tracker and all the bugs now have arches CC'd on > the bugs so, once the glibc-2.8 stab tracker is resolved (which Fauli > has been working on) I think we should be good to mark gcc-4.3 stable. I'm going through the list and marking anything that i think should block stabilization as P1. In the end though it's up to toolchain to decide when they want to go ahead. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
