Friedrich Oslage wrote: > Josh Saddler schrieb: >> Mmm, not so much. Documentation like this, that's so specific to one >> particular architecture, would be better off in project documentation -- >> that's (partly) why ya'll have project directories in the first place. >> Otherwise it becomes a maintenance burden for the GDP. It'll be easier >> on the Sparc team to maintain it if it's in their own /proj/ space. > >> What we can do, however, is list it in metadoc.xml, so that it will show >> up in /doc/en/list.xml. > > > Right, x86 or ppc users won't benefit from reading it ;) > > I moved it to the sparc space and attached the revided news item. > > Regards, > Friedrich
s/mutlilib/multilib/ I also don't understand why this news item needed to wait for a Portage to go stable. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
