Am Sonntag, den 04.01.2009, 18:06 +0100 schrieb Jeroen Roovers:
> On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:02:21 +0000
> Mike Auty <ike...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > According to [1], "When the file lists multiple entries, then you
> > assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the other
> > maintainer(s) and herd(s)." So it looks as though the file should go
> > through the maintainers first and herds second? Should be pretty
> > easy to fix...
>
> I spotted that too but didn't remember putting it in black and white. :)
>
> The order ("first maintainer as assignee" or "first maintainer/herd as
> assignee") is open to discussion and I think this is the proper forum to
> have that discussion.I'd say that the correct way to fix this is to fix the metadata schema to be able to write something like this: <maintainer> <team>foo</team> </maintainer> <maintainer> <dev>adev</dev> </maintainer> <maintainer> <team>bar</team> </maintainer> or <maintainer type="team">foo</maintainer> <maintainer type="dev">adev</maintainer> <maintainer type="team">bar</maintainer> Because having to write this: <herd>foo</herd> <maintainer><email>a...@gentoo.org</email></maintainer> <herd>bar</herd> is just nonsense. Cheers, Tiziano -- ------------------------------------------------------- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
