Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org> posted 20090104174353.22981...@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net, excerpted below, on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:43:53 +0100:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100 > Christian Faulhammer <fa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description >> line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that >> way. > > "Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages should > detail the package atom(s) as completely as possible in the Summary, > including a version only when other versions do not exhibit the > bug."[1] > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/ I think the problem is more as in this bug. Note the "Amarok2", the reason I ended up filing a dup, because I searched for "amarok-2" and didn't catch this bug. Someone with the authority to do so might wish to change the summary accordingly... altho it does seem most CCs were able to find the bug without the dup I ended up with, and the bug is still getting frequent CC additions. Amarok2 - dev-db/mysql-community - ld: /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqld.a (client.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `client_errors' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238487 -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
