On Monday 06 October 2008 16:07:14 Jeremy Olexa wrote: > Does it *really* matter if these under-staffed "odd" arches > have a stable tree or not? If there is a problem with a stable package > right now, will there be a new version marked stable in a reasonable > amount of time? I think we can conclude that having a stable tree for > understaffed arches might cause more harm than good.
how exactly do you propose we sanely build stages for such arches then ? short answer: you cant. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
