On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:04:33 -0500 Daniel Gryniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Honestly, I don't want to be a dick to the arch teams. I really > don't. But I *also* don't want them (or policy) to be a dick to me. > That's my whole point; that requirement of never removing the last > stable ebuild, in shouting caps no less, is way too absolute, and is > just going to piss people like me off. For the record, the all in caps bit was a tongue-in-cheek reference to the ultra-formal format that the IETF RFC's are in that was being emulated here. It was included for levity, not for shouting. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
