On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # Gen 2 Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (`date`) > # Masked for testing. >>=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver > > > Please people, > > > if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it.If you find > that you cannot commit an ebuild because of badly keyworded > dependencies, then drop the relevant keywords and file a bug report > with a KEYWORDREQ.
So you have made two comments. 1) 'Package.mask not for testing.' 2) 'If you cannot commit an ebuild due to badly keyworded deps; file bugs to get them fixed.' I agree with 2 but not with 1. If pmask is not for testing...what is it for? -Alec > > > Kind regards, > JeR > >
