Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:34:33 +0100:
> "Why do we never have time to do it right, but always plenty of time to > do it over." > In this case, you're saying "oh anyone who wants something that copes > with all filenames can do their own." IOW to do it right, we'll have to > do it over, further down the line. It seems to me, we're building a lib function. As such, we can take the time to do it right, now, and won't have to worry about it again. Asking someone to code their own solution if it's doing the same thing but with "complex" filenames is asking for trouble. We already have designs for a good wheel and are now discussing asking people to design their own. Why? If we do it right in the default function, particularly since it can be called /as/ a default function in an expanded version if necessary, there's one less place to make brain-dead mistakes like that missing double-quote. That said, as always, I'm quite aware I'm not the one actually implementing it, so I'm not going to throw stones regardless of how it's implemented. I just know if I ever decide to take that step to Gentoo devhood, or even just for my own ebuilds, it's sure be nice to not even have to worry about whether there's spaces or weird chars in the name, period. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
