On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:15:32 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008-07-09 15:45:15 Doug Goldstein napisał(a): > > Luca Barbato wrote: > > > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > >> On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar > > >> Arahesis wrote: > > >>>> How can you easily revert it in a profile? > > >>> You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults. > > >> > > >> How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice. > > > > > > Shouldn't possible have a subprofile with compiler/linker > > > specifics and move there non sharable stuff and keep base leaner? > > > > > > lu > > > > > I'm just going to commit this to default/linux in about 20 minutes > > -Wl,-O1 > > Cardoe informed me that he planned to add --hash-style=gnu and > --sort-common to default LDFLAGS in the future. > > Does anybody know any packages / architectures (except mips) which > have any problems with these flags? We have versions of glibc pre-2.5 that don't have support for .gnu.hash. Can we set a minimum version in the profiles? No one should be using them, but you never know. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
