On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:16:36 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernd Steinhauser wrote: > > Wow, impressive. > > > > Actually, you can't be serious... > > I am. > > GLEP 54 for quite some time now and it works very well. > > adds nothing to -9999 and sets usage as is. > > I just don't see any benefit from your proposal, on the contrary > > there are issues. > > No. Yes. > > > And that includes the ordering. > > No. Yes. GLEP 54 is fine as is. Not one person has expressed approval at your current proprosal, and many people from many different viewpoints have expressed disapproval. Simplying saying "no" does not make these criticisms go away. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
