Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
No, we were trying to get the pkgcore people to write some frickin'
test cases for their code rather than continuing to screw up the
process by incorrectly claiming support for an EAPI.
That isn't what has been perceived.
Whoever will take the portage specification will have to provide
testcases while updating the spec, correctly split an version it to make
implementation easier and behave properly.
You should instead be asking the pkgcore guys why they should be
allowed to continue keeping a package in the tree when they're
blatantly ignoring the EAPI process.
The eapi process is something not defined so they cannot do much about
it, same for the portage people.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
