On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:54:46 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs > > Somebody is thinking the PMS and the EAPI definition as it is are > wrong and should be replaced since they aren't useful for their > purpose.
Anyone thinking that has a very limited understanding of how things work. Let's face it, there hasn't been any correct criticism, and any complaints have been from people who don't understand what's going on anyway and who seek to blame EAPI for Portage's lack of progress, rather than blaming Portage's lack of progress for lack of new EAPIs as they should. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
