Hi, I sent this to -dev to, but I think as an ordinary user I can't write there...
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that > does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done > in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple > kilobytes of code for the unpacking from a VFS. Meanwhile please > consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not > roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can. tar-1.20 has lzma support, so maybe it could handle this too, once it goes into stable. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
