On Wednesday 23 April 2008 23:01:38 Graham Murray wrote: > Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wednesday 23 April 2008 21:46:18 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > >> See my attached example from work, we use a lot of the various options > >> on stuff. > > > > No, we won't support that. However, we will bring back ip ranges for the > > last ocet like so > > 1.2.3.4-10/24 > > It looks to me as though you are intending to remove the capability to > set up complex network environments.
No I'm not. I'm making it easy for simple configs AND complex ones. Just not through the same variable. > [1] But in my opinion, the baselayout-1 /etc/net.conf syntax is better than > that in baselayout-2. Though I have not yet migrated any of the systems > with complex networking to baselayout-2. Sadly, default scripts we ship have to work with shells other than bash. Of course, you're still welcome to use config_eth0 as a bash array as that still works and will for the foreseeable future. Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
