Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:09:24 -0700 Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 11:49 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > thirty days is the norm for the minimal period between an ebuilds > > > last > > It is the norm. It is not a requirement. In fact, it is > specifically a "guideline" rather than a hard rule. It is up to the > maintainer's discretion when to ask for stabilization, just like it > is up to the arch team's discretion when to actually *do* the > stabilization. If you don't think that it's ready on your arch, say > so, but be prepared to defend why you think so when the package > maintainer, who should be much more familiar with the package, thinks > that it is ready. > > > > On the other hand, maybe these early stabilisation bug reports > > > are a sign of the times and we need to shorten the normal thirty > > > day period, become even more of a cutting edge distro - or at > > > least discuss the options. > > > > I'd say leave the current norm and smack the misbehaving > > maintainers :) > > Who says that they're misbehaving? Again, the maintainers probably > know their packages better than anyone else, so why are we not > trusting their judgement again? > Thanks for this, I was going to reply in similar fashion but didn't want to (accidentally) start flaming.. - drac -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
