On 11:35 Thu 03 Apr , Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Petteri R??ty wrote: >> Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti: >>> Petteri R??ty wrote: >>> >>> >>> As others have commented, I don't agree with this point. Also, you're >>> forgetting we have quite a few people working on this project and that we >>> have many different roles. >> > >> And you are assuming that undertakers wouldn't check their role before >> acting. > > I read it as a rule to drop developers. If we're only talking about it > raising a warning to undertakers so they can check the dev status, then I > don't have a problem with the proposal. > >>> Recalling previous discussions about work on gentoo and some of the >>> existing roles, what will you do to AT folks, release members or QA >>> members? Are they also obliged to do a weekly commit to keep their >>> "privileges"? >> AT folks aren't devs and see above. > > To be clear, I didn't meant arch testers but people that do keywords for > arch teams.
Actually, 'AT' can refer to either arch teams or Arch Testers, but given the fact that he was referring to those people with commit access, it should be obvious he meant 'Arch Teams'. Thomas -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
