Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:34 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140
Alright, so portage has put this stuff to stderr since January 4.
Then why are we also adding workarounds to individual eclasses?
How many people are running a Portage version released after January 4?
Eventually, all of them.
--
fonts, by design, by neglect
gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect
wxwindows @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
