On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:32 -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > That nothing that you've said counters the package not being needed in > the system target. In fact, the packages that you list all explicitly > depend on debianutils, so they wouldn't break if we removed it from > system. The problem is packages which require debianutils but do *not* > depend on it, because it's in "system" now.
I'm running a stage build with debianutils removed from system. I'll let everyone know the results. If it works, I'll do the same for a LiveDVD build, which covers most of the major packages in the tree. Sure, there might be a few stragglers after that, but I doubt that there would be too many. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Games Developer -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
