On Wednesday, 09. January 2008 19:45:38 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Then the one particular part of 3.5.5 that's affected gets fixed > > > and priority keyworded. > > So you suggest that mips keeps doing nothing and expect others to > > work *more* in exchange for that? > Well, most users will simply ignore or postpone the mass upgrade,
So far so good. If users postpone it, that's entirely their responsibility. > so yes. That's not so good, though, and where we really disagree. Thanks for the straight answer, though. In my book, it's not acceptable to not do one's job properly and by that force others to do more. You basically told me the same when I suggested likewise measures against mips. :-) The only difference being that we supported KDE 3.5.5 for a long time and gave mips months to get up to speed again. > Forcing a mass upgrade is rarely if ever the correct solution to > any security issue. I absolutely agree. This, IMO, is such a case, though. -- Best regards, Wulf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
