> Why taking it against arch teams? How is that different from "certain > maintainer not taking care of a bug that holds stabilization of certain > package by some time measured in months" ? I'll tell you my answer: 'no > difference at all'.
You are right, there's not much difference. However, I brought up the topic because I felt like this particular situation was a bit of a problem that needed to be addressed. Yours is also one that can/should potentially be addressed, and I advise you to recommend the council discuss it as well. My goal wasn't to point fingers or to call anyone lazy. My goal was to address that if development in this certain area has stagnated, how can those of us who it affects continue to move forward? This is simply an area that is "gray" and needs to be discussed. There are many other gray areas that need to be discussed too. I understand we all have real lives and are volunteers. But if there are areas that we are responsible for and we aren't able to meet the needs/demands of the other developers in those areas, it's only fair to let them continue moving forward. I never even mentioned any specific arch in my original request, nor did I call any developer out. So please, nobody needs to take this personally. Caleb -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
