On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:21:39 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:40:43 -0600
> > Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I have four versions of freetype sitting around that I'd really
> >> like to get rid of
> > 
> > And what is the cost of you not getting rid of them? Is there any
> > particular reason it matters when it's done?
> 
> The general maintenance cost of any ebuild in the tree.  If we want
> to make an external or global change in how the package is built or
> used, we have to make sure those changes work with all versions in
> the tree.

And do you actually want to make such a change? If you do, give an
explanation, and demonstrate why it can't be solved simply by
dependencies.

Most of the time, when people are moaning about 'slacker' archs, they
don't have any kind of decent technical reason for doing so... In cases
where such a reason exists, the arch teams are usually quite happy to
prioritise if asked.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to