On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 05:50:11 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You pretty much have to have a way of mapping an EAPI version onto > > an absolute version if you want to handle it sanely. > > Right, and that's likely to cause a mess in the long run IMO.
Eh, it's already necessary if package managers want to support things like CPAN natively. It's not too big a deal. > > Mmm, no. You have some concept of a superset of all supported naming > > rules, then refine once you've extracted the EAPI. > > Assuming the current package manager supports all used EAPIs, > otherwise a formerly invalid name could still break it. 'Twould just have to ignore them. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
