Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:21:06 +0000 > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Whatever. EAPI="2" works fine with current software. Could you tell >> me why you're so hot on export'ing EAPI? I thought it was only >> relevant, environment-wise, to the ebuild and subshells. What is the >> use case for exporting it externally? > > I'm going to ignore you until you post a lengthy explanation of why > what you just said was utter bollocks. You clearly don't have a clue > what you're talking about just now, and by continuing to post nonsense > like the above to the discussion you're wasting everyone's time. > > Honestly, that was the single most wrong thing anyone's said in this > entire discussion. > Er two questions, not statements. The package manager knows the value; so does bash. Why on earth does, say, make need to know it?
(Not that it's hard to allow 'export' in the line, just wondering why it keeps getting raised as required.) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
