On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 08:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem right now is that while you are correct, that's the > official list, due to technical/political issues, the Gentoo-official > PMS repo doesn't (or didn't as of the last council meeting, according > to the log) have any EAPI-1 info at all, as it's currently outdated, > with the work all going into the off-Gentoo repo.
No no. The 'Gentoo-official' repo doesn't have any EAPI-1 info at all because whoever's supposed to have set up the 'Gentoo-official' repo hasn't bothered to tell any of the people doing the committing a) where the repo is or how to commit to it, b) what the technical reasons for moving away from the current repo are or c) who all has root on the box upon which the repo is hosted. Even if any of the PMS contributors *wanted* to commit to an official Gentoo repository, they couldn't because neither the Council nor whoever did the setting up have bothered to tell them about it. > (Apparently, there aren't any official Gentoo devs working on PMS > ATM. =8^( Did I mention political issues in addition to technical > ones?) So far as I'm aware, spb is still technically an official Gentoo developer. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
