Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:58:28PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote: >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:09:27 +0800 >>> Zhang Le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> IMHO, what is more ridiculous is keeping ask other to be quiet in a >>>> discussion which is supposed to be open to everyone who cares about >>>> it. >>> It's open to anyone who cares about it and is knowledgeable enough to >>> provide informed commentary. Anything else is just noise. >> At least not to tell others to be quiet. >> It is a discussion after all. >> We can let them become knowledgeable, at least we should try. > > Heh... unfortunately this is gentoo and this behaviour is tolerated. Try > to go with this same thing to the lkml[*1*]. Ask them to teach you C so > you can contribute with your opinion to every single patch and design > decision that is made. Then tell them they should teach you stuff about > OS design because you _are_entitled_ an opinion, then .... [then, sane > people see how this approach gets silly]
I have mailed my patch to LKML. So I know the situation there. Linux kernel community has a kernelnewbie mailing list. But we don't have one. We don't even have enough docs to educate our future potential package manager maintainer. Note I am not blaming anyone there. Let's start from ourselves. -- Zhang Le, Robert GPG key ID: 1E4E2973 Fingerprint: 0260 C902 B8F8 6506 6586 2B90 BC51 C808 1E4E 2973 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
